- BADI Definition or Implementation
- BADI's Type
- BADI's Scenario
- Identify Standard BADI's
- Steps to implement BADI
- Identify the all implementations of BADI
- User Exits and types of User Exits
- Steps to Implement User Exits
- Best Practices of Using User Exits
- User Exits vs BADI's and when to use which?
- Real-world Example of user exits in SAP SD/MM/PP
- Enhancing Standard SAP Functionality with user exits
- Customer Exits and its types
- Identifying Customer exits
- Implementing Customer Exits
- Best practices for using customer exits
- Practical Example
- Troubleshooting common issues
- Comparing Customer exits with other Enhancement Techniques
- Real-Time Case Studies
- Enhancement Framework and its Types
- Enhancement Apportunities
- Implement Explicit Enhancements
- Working with Implicit Enhancements
- Understanding and Implementing BADIs in ABAP
- Enhancement spot and Enhancement implementation
- Tools of Enhancement Framework and Transactions
- Advance topics in the Enhancement framework
- Case Studies and real-life examples
- Introduction Enhancement Spot and Types
- Ways to Finding Enhancement Spots
- Creating an Explicit Enhancement Spot
- Implementing Enhancements using Enhancement Spot
- Managing enhancement implementations
- Advance topics in Enhancement Spots
- Best Practices for using Enhancement Spot
24ENHANCEMENT0610 – Comparing Customer exits with other Enhancement Techniques
key differences between the enhancement techniques:
1. Flexibility:
- Customer Exits: Limited to predefined points.
- User Exits: Limited, mainly subroutine-based.
- BAdI’s: More flexible, allowing multiple implementations (especially New BAdIs).
- Enhancement Framework: Highly flexible, allowing enhancements almost anywhere in the code.
- Modifications: Full control but risky.
2. Upgrade Safety:
- Customer Exits: Safe during upgrades.
- User Exits: Riskier than customer exits due to direct code involvement.
- BAdI’s: Safe during upgrades.
- Enhancement Framework: Safe during upgrades.
- Modifications: Not upgrade-safe; requires manual reapplication after upgrades.
3. Ease of Implementation:
- Customer Exits: Easy to implement.
- User Exits: Moderate, subroutine-based.
- BAdI’s: Moderate, requires object-oriented programming knowledge.
- Enhancement Framework: More complex, requires knowledge of enhancement points and sections.
- Modifications: Difficult to manage, especially during upgrades.
4. Object-Oriented Support:
- Customer Exits: No object-oriented support.
- User Exits: No object-oriented support.
- BAdI’s: Fully supports object-oriented programming.
- Enhancement Framework: Supports object-oriented programming.
- Modifications: N/A.
5. Multiple Implementations:
- Customer Exits: Does not support multiple implementations.
- User Exits: Does not support multiple implementations.
- BadI’s: New BAdIs support multiple implementations.
- Enhancement Framework: Supports multiple enhancements at a single point.
- Modifications: N/A.
6. SAP Recommendation:
- Customer Exits: Recommended for simple enhancements.
- User Exits: Considered obsolete by SAP.
- BAdI’s: Recommended, especially New BAdIs for complex processes.
- Enhancement Framework: Highly recommended for flexible, upgrade-safe enhancements.
- Modifications: Not recommended, unless absolutely necessary.
7. Use Cases:
- Customer Exits: Simple enhancements like screen or menu options.
- User Exits: Legacy modules like SD and MM.
- BAdI’s: Complex business processes requiring multiple triggers.
- Enhancement Framework: Ideal for SAP S/4HANA and replacing standard logic.
- Modifications: Only for critical and unique business needs where no other option is viable.
Customer Exits and User Exits are simple and suitable for smaller enhancements, especially in older SAP versions.
BAdIs and the Enhancement Framework offer greater flexibility and are ideal for more complex customizations in modern SAP systems.
Modifications should be avoided unless absolutely necessary due to the risks associated with upgrades and maintenance.
Author : Aniket Pawar, 9373518385
24ENHANCEMENT0610 – Comparing Customer exits with other Enhancement Techniques
key differences between the enhancement techniques:
1. Flexibility:
- Customer Exits: Limited to predefined points.
- User Exits: Limited, mainly subroutine-based.
- BAdI’s: More flexible, allowing multiple implementations (especially New BAdIs).
- Enhancement Framework: Highly flexible, allowing enhancements almost anywhere in the code.
- Modifications: Full control but risky.
2. Upgrade Safety:
- Customer Exits: Safe during upgrades.
- User Exits: Riskier than customer exits due to direct code involvement.
- BAdI’s: Safe during upgrades.
- Enhancement Framework: Safe during upgrades.
- Modifications: Not upgrade-safe; requires manual reapplication after upgrades.
3. Ease of Implementation:
- Customer Exits: Easy to implement.
- User Exits: Moderate, subroutine-based.
- BAdI’s: Moderate, requires object-oriented programming knowledge.
- Enhancement Framework: More complex, requires knowledge of enhancement points and sections.
- Modifications: Difficult to manage, especially during upgrades.
4. Object-Oriented Support:
- Customer Exits: No object-oriented support.
- User Exits: No object-oriented support.
- BAdI’s: Fully supports object-oriented programming.
- Enhancement Framework: Supports object-oriented programming.
- Modifications: N/A.
5. Multiple Implementations:
- Customer Exits: Does not support multiple implementations.
- User Exits: Does not support multiple implementations.
- BadI’s: New BAdIs support multiple implementations.
- Enhancement Framework: Supports multiple enhancements at a single point.
- Modifications: N/A.
6. SAP Recommendation:
- Customer Exits: Recommended for simple enhancements.
- User Exits: Considered obsolete by SAP.
- BAdI’s: Recommended, especially New BAdIs for complex processes.
- Enhancement Framework: Highly recommended for flexible, upgrade-safe enhancements.
- Modifications: Not recommended, unless absolutely necessary.
7. Use Cases:
- Customer Exits: Simple enhancements like screen or menu options.
- User Exits: Legacy modules like SD and MM.
- BAdI’s: Complex business processes requiring multiple triggers.
- Enhancement Framework: Ideal for SAP S/4HANA and replacing standard logic.
- Modifications: Only for critical and unique business needs where no other option is viable.
Customer Exits and User Exits are simple and suitable for smaller enhancements, especially in older SAP versions.
BAdIs and the Enhancement Framework offer greater flexibility and are ideal for more complex customizations in modern SAP systems.
Modifications should be avoided unless absolutely necessary due to the risks associated with upgrades and maintenance.
Author : Aniket Pawar, 9373518385